A Comprehensive Review of Harvesting Equipment for Rhizome and Tuber Crops: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Trends, Influences, Intellectual Structures, and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.57.1.19Keywords:
Bibliometric analysis , mechanization, precise agriculture , soil interaction , harvesting machines , rhizome and tuber crops, machine learningAbstract
The mechanization of harvesting operations is essential for improving productivity in rhizome and tuber crop production, which demands specialized equipment due to the subterranean nature of these crops. This study aims to analyze global research trends, intellectual foundations, and emerging themes in harvesting equipment for rhizome and tuber crops. A systematic bibliometric and thematic analysis was conducted using the PRISMA framework, examining 165 publications from 2010 to 2024 retrieved from the Scopus database. Analytical tools including Biblioshiny and VOSviewer were employed to perform co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and co-occurrence mapping. Results indicate a steady rise in global research output, with significant contributions from China, Russia, and India. Two dominant thematic areas emerged: the optimization and performance of harvesting machinery, and the interaction of these machines with soil conditions, highlighting sustainability. Key technological trends include automation, sensor-based systems, and artificial intelligence. Despite advancements, high costs and low adoption among smallholder farmers remain challenges. This study offers a strategic overview to guide future innovations and policymaking in sustainable agricultural mechanization.
References
1. PALANI H., NANDA S., SAJEEV M., SHERIFFUDIN J., PADMAJA G. POST HARVEST EQUIPMENTS IN TUBER CROPS-REVIEW.
2. AMPONSAH S. K., ADDO A., GANGADHARAN B. Review of various harvesting options for cassava, Cassava; Waisundara, VY, Ed; IntechOpen: London, UK 2018: 291-304.
3. SHRIVASTAVA A. K. Design and development of a digging machine for turmeric and ginger crop, Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences (IJEMS) 2022: 29: 283-390.
4. YOUNUS A., JAYAN P. Performance evaluation of root crop harvesters, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 2015: 11: 38-52.
5. KAUR B., DIMRI S., SINGH J., MISHRA S., CHAUHAN N., KUKRETI T. et al. Insights into the harvesting tools and equipment's for horticultural crops: From then to now, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2023: 14: 100814.
6. ULYANOV M., SKRIPKIN D., KHARLASHIN A., ULYANOVA A., AYUGIN N., KHALIMOV R. S. Improving the design of a root crop harvester in order to increase the sustainability of agriculture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: IOP Publishing; 2022, p. 012056.
7. GONG Z., SONG Q., YANG Y. Development and Evaluation of Mechanical Harvesting of Root Crops and its Performance Optimization. 2023 7th International Conference on Electrical, Mechanical and Computer Engineering (ICEMCE): IEEE; 2023, p. 782-788.
8. GUO R., LI Z., ZHAO P., YU T., YANG Y., BAI X. Design and operating parameter optimization of a harvester for efficient lily bulb cultivation, Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2021: 37: 635-644.
9. SAIMURUGAN M., SWARNAM B., BALAJI P., AKHIL P. Design and development of turmeric harvesting machine. AIP Conference Proceedings: AIP Publishing; 2021.
10. KALININ A., TEPLINSKY I., RUZHEV V. Improvement of digging shares of root harvesting machines based on rheological model of soil state, Proceedings of the Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia 2021: 26-28.
11. GEBBERS R., ADAMCHUK V. I. Precision agriculture and food security, Science 2010: 327: 828-831.
12. GUPTA P., BALAS P., BAMBHANIYA V. Comparison between Manual Harvesting and Mechanical Harvesting, Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2024: 30: 917-934.
13. BERHANE G., DEREJE M., MINTEN B., TAMRU S. The rapid–but from a low base–uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications and challenges: Intl Food Policy Res Inst; 2017.
14. KANG S., JUNG H., KWON S., JANG Y., WOO S., HA Y. Promoting the Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Farmers Through Versatile Machinery in the Republic of Korea, Sustainability 2024: 16: 10022.
15. PAGE M. J., MCKENZIE J. E., BOSSUYT P. M., BOUTRON I., HOFFMANN T. C., MULROW C. D. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, bmj 2021: 372.
16. ARIA M., CUCCURULLO C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of informetrics 2017: 11: 959-975.
17. VAN ECK N., WALTMAN L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping, scientometrics 2010: 84: 523-538.
18. AL-MALLAHI A., KATAOKA T., OKAMOTO H., SHIBATA Y. Detection of potato tubers using an ultraviolet imaging-based machine vision system, Biosystems engineering 2010: 105: 257-265.
19. AL-MALLAHI A., KATAOKA T., OKAMOTO H., SHIBATA Y. An image processing algorithm for detecting in-line potato tubers without singulation, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2010: 70: 239-244.
20. AWUAH E., ZHOU J., LIANG Z., AIKINS K. A., GBENONTIN B. V., MECHA P. et al. Parametric analysis and numerical optimisation of Jerusalem artichoke vibrating digging shovel using discrete element method, Soil and Tillage Research 2022: 219: 105344.
21. CHEN M., LIU X., HU P., ZHAI X., HAN Z., SHI Y. et al. Study on rotor vibration potato-soil separation device for potato harvester using DEM-MBD coupling simulation, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2024: 218: 108638.
22. MCPHEE J. E., ANTILLE D. L., TULLBERG J. N., DOYLE R. B., BOERSMA M. Managing soil compaction–A choice of low-mass autonomous vehicles or controlled traffic?, Biosystems Engineering 2020: 195: 227-241.
23. MCPHEE J. E., AIRD P. L. Controlled traffic for vegetable production: Part 1. Machinery challenges and options in a diversified vegetable industry, Biosystems Engineering 2013: 116: 144-154.
24. WANG S., HU Z., YAO L., PENG B., WANG B., WANG Y. Simulation and parameter optimisation of pickup device for full-feed peanut combine harvester, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2022: 192: 106602.
25. WEI Z., LI H., SUN C., SU G., LIU W., LI X. Experiments and analysis of a conveying device for soil separation and clod-crushing for a potato harvester, Applied engineering in agriculture 2019: 35: 987-996.
26. JIA B., SUN W., ZHAO Z., WANG H., ZHANG H., LIU X. et al. Design and field test of a remotely controlled self-propelled potato harvester with manual sorting platform, American Journal of Potato Research 2023: 100: 193-209.
27. IBRAHIM I. M. I., ZHANG Z. G., EL-KOLALY W., YANG X., WANG H. Y. Design, ansys analysis and performance evaluation of potato digger harvester, International Agricultural Engineering Journal 2020: 29: 60-73.
28. HEVKO R., TKACHENKO I., SYNII S., FLONTS I. Development of design and investigation of operation processes of small-sclale root crop and potato harvesters, 2016.
29. BULGAKOV V., NIKOLAENKO S., ADAMCHUK V., RUZHУLO Z., OLT J. Theory of retaining potato bodies during operation of spiral separator, 2018.
30. HOSAINPOUR A., KOMARIZADE M. H., MAHMOUDI A., SHAYESTEH M. G. High speed detection of potato and clod using an acoustic based intelligent system, Expert Systems with Applications 2011: 38: 12101-12106.
31. AL-DOSARY N. M. N. Potato harvester performance on tuber damage at the eastern of Saudi Arabia, Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 2016: 18: 32-42.
32. PEDERSEN H. H., OUDSHOORN F. W., MCPHEE J., CHAMEN W. Wide span–re-mechanising vegetable production. XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): 1130; 2014, p. 551-558.
33. HRUSHETSKY S., YAROPUD V., DUGANETS V., PRYSHLIAK V., KURYLO V. Research of constructive and regulatory parameters of the assembly working parts for potato harvesting machines, INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering 2019: 58.
34. KHURA T., MANI I., SRIVASTAVA A. Design and development of tractor-drawn onion (Allium cepa) harvester, Indian J Agric Sci 2011: 6: 528-532.
35. HRUSHETSKYI S., YAROPUD V., KUPCHUK I., SEMENYSHENA R. The Heap Parts Movement on the Share-Board Surface of the Potato Harvesting Machine, Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series II: Forestry• Wood Industry• Agricultural Food Engineering 2021: 127-140.
36. SIBIREV A., AKSENOV A., DOROKHOV A., PONOMAREV A. Comparative study of the force action of harvester work tools on potato tubers, Research in Agricultural Engineering 2019: 65: 85-90.
37. HE X., LV Y., QU Z., WANG W., ZHOU Z., HE H. Parameters optimization and test of caterpillar self-propelled tiger nut harvester hoisting device, Agriculture 2022: 12: 1060.
38. BULGAKOV V., PASCUZZI S., NIKOLAENKO S., SANTORO F., SOTIRIOS ANIFANTIS A., OLT J. Theoretical study on sieving of potato heap elements in spiral separator, 2019.
39. WANG X., SUN J., XU Y., LI X., CHENG P. Design and experiment of potato cleaning and sorting machine, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 2017: 48: 316-322.
40. BULGAKOV V., IVANOVS S., ADAMCHUK V., IHNATIEV Y. Investigation of the influence of the parameters of the experimental spiral potato heap separator on the quality of work, Agronomy Research 2017: 15.
41. MISENER G., MCLEOD C. A resource efficient approach to potato-stone-clod separation, 1989.
42. FELLER R., MARGOLIN E., HETZRONI A., GALILI N. Impingement angle and product interference effects on clod separation, Transactions of the ASAE 1987: 30: 357-0360.
43. WU B., HUANG T., QIU X., ZUO T., WANG X., XIE F. Design and experimental study of potato-soil separation device for sticky soils condition, Applied Sciences 2021: 11: 10959.
44. GAO G., ZHANG D., LIU J. Design of a new soil-tuber separation device on potato harvesters. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IV: 4th IFIP TC 12 Conference, CCTA 2010, Nanchang, China, October 22-25, 2010, Selected Papers, Part III 4: Springer; 2011, p. 604-612.
45. DOROKHOV A., PONOMAREV A., ZERNOV V., PETUKHOV S., AKSENOV A., SIBIREV A. et al. The results of laboratory studies of the device for evaluation of suitability of potato tubers for mechanized harvesting, Applied sciences 2022: 12: 2171.
46. DOROKHOV A., AKSENOV A., SIBIREV A., SAZONOV N. Justification of design and technological parameters of the onion harvester bed-shaping roller spiral drum, INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering 2020: 60.
47. LOBACHEVSKY Y., DOROKHOV A., AKSENOV A., SIBIREV A., MOSKOVSKIY M., MOSYAKOV M. et al. RAMAN and Fluorimetric Scattering Lidar Facilitated to Detect Damaged Potatoes by Determination of Spectra, Applied Sciences 2022: 12: 5391.
48. BAYBOBOEV N., GOYIPOV U., HAMZAYEV A., AKBAROV S. B., TURSUNOV A. Substantiation and calculation of gaps of the separating working bodies of machines for cleaning the tubers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: IOP Publishing; 2021, p. 012022.
49. XIN L. L., LIANG J. H. Design of conveyor separation device for potato harvester and analysis of its vibration characteristics, Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2022: 22: 1385-1392.
50. FAN J., LI Y., LUO W., YANG K., YU Z., WANG S. et al. An Experimental Study of Stem Transported-Posture Adjustment Mechanism in Potato Harvesting, Agronomy 2023: 13: 234.
51. OLT J., ADAMCHUK V., KORNIUSHYN V., MELNIK V., KALETNIK H., IHNATIEV Y. et al. Research into the parameters of a potato harvester's potato heap distributor, and the justification of those parameters, 2021.
52. JU Y., SUN W., ZHAO Z., WANG H., LIU X., ZHANG H. et al. Development and testing of a self-propelled machine for combined potato harvesting and residual plastic film retrieval, Machines 2023: 11: 432.
53. LIU Y., ZHOU Y., LV W., HUANG H., ZHANG G., TU M. et al. Design and experiment of hydraulic scouring system of wide-width lotus root digging machine, Agriculture 2021: 11: 1110.
54. ZENG R., LIN Y., WAN Z., TU M., JIAO J., ZHANG G. An investigation of pull-out force of semi-buried lotus roots after hydraulic scouring, Agriculture 2021: 11: 706.
55. ZHANG H., ZHOU Z., QU Z., LI Z., WANG W. Simulation and experiment of sieving process of sieving device for tiger nut harvester, Agriculture 2022: 12: 1680.
56. QU Z., HAN M., LV Y., ZHOU Z., LV Z., WANG W. et al. Design and Test of a Crawler-Type Tiger-Nut Combine Harvester, Agriculture 2023: 13: 277.
57. HUANG T., BEI W., LUCEN L., TIANLIN Z., FANGPING X. Construction of impact mechanics model and experimental study on impact damage of potato tuber, INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering 2022: 66.
58. KHAMALETDINOV R., MARTYNOV V., MUDARISOV S., GABITOV I., KHASANOV E., PERVUSHIN A. Substantiation of rational parameters of the root crops separator with a rotating inner separation surface, Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2020: 51: 15-20.
59. ZHAO P., GUO R. J., JIN T. C., ZHANG G. Z., NING X. F. Collision simulation of potato tubers for mechanized harvesting, Journal of Food Process Engineering 2023: 46: e14278.
60. HOSAINPOUR A., KOMARIZADE M. H., MAHMOUDI A., SHAYESTEH M. Feasibility of impact-acoustic emissions for discriminating between potato tubers and clods, Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 2010: 8: 565-569.
61. DOROKHOV A., DIDMANIDZE O., AKSENOV A., SIBIREV A., SAZONOV N., MOSYAKOV M. et al. The Results of Studies on the Assessment of the Destruction of Soil Clods during Combine Harvesting of Potatoes, Agriculture 2022: 12: 2024.
62. XIE H., GAO G., TIAN B., LI B., ZHANG S., HUANG J. Optimization of potato soil transportation separation mechanism based on discrete element method and TRIZ theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series: IOP Publishing; 2019, p. 012071.
63. XIN L. L., LIANG J. Design of Potato Harvester; 2017.
64. BULGAKOV V., IVANOVS S., PASCUZZI S., ADAMCHUK V., RUZHYLO Z., IHNATIEV Y. et al. Experimental research of quality indicators of operation of new potato harvester, Engineering for Rural Development 2022: 21: 701-707.
